<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Falcon serendipitous performance findings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.mysql.com/gmax/2007/12/02/falcon-serendipitous-performance-findings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.mysql.com/gmax/2007/12/02/falcon-serendipitous-performance-findings/</link>
	<description>Wizardry and community</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 02:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: gmax</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mysql.com/gmax/2007/12/02/falcon-serendipitous-performance-findings/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>gmax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 21:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mysql.com/gmax/2007/12/02/falcon-serendipitous-performance-findings/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Jeremy, Jay,
That was not a miscalculation, but bad grammar :).
Not 176 times faster than MyISAM, but faster than MyISAM 176 times.

Sorry for the mixup.

Giuseppe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy, Jay,<br />
That was not a miscalculation, but bad grammar :).<br />
Not 176 times faster than MyISAM, but faster than MyISAM 176 times.</p>
<p>Sorry for the mixup.</p>
<p>Giuseppe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Pipes</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mysql.com/gmax/2007/12/02/falcon-serendipitous-performance-findings/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Pipes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mysql.com/gmax/2007/12/02/falcon-serendipitous-performance-findings/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Correction on numbers....

Hi G, I detected a miscalculation in your results...

0.002847/0.000254 = 11.208661417
0.000302/0.000254 = 1.188976378

So, Falcon is approximately 11.2 times faster than MyISAM for the test and approximately 1.19 times faster than InnoDB...

Not quite the awesome results you state, but still impressive.

Cheers,

jay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction on numbers&#8230;.</p>
<p>Hi G, I detected a miscalculation in your results&#8230;</p>
<p>0.002847/0.000254 = 11.208661417<br />
0.000302/0.000254 = 1.188976378</p>
<p>So, Falcon is approximately 11.2 times faster than MyISAM for the test and approximately 1.19 times faster than InnoDB&#8230;</p>
<p>Not quite the awesome results you state, but still impressive.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>jay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Cole</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mysql.com/gmax/2007/12/02/falcon-serendipitous-performance-findings/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 23:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mysql.com/gmax/2007/12/02/falcon-serendipitous-performance-findings/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Hi Giuseppe,

Hmm, to me your comments on performance and the numbers in your table do not line up at all.  Are your comments based on some other data?

myisam/falcon = 11.208661
innodb/falcon = 1.188976

Where did you get your 143x and 176x numbers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Giuseppe,</p>
<p>Hmm, to me your comments on performance and the numbers in your table do not line up at all.  Are your comments based on some other data?</p>
<p>myisam/falcon = 11.208661<br />
innodb/falcon = 1.188976</p>
<p>Where did you get your 143x and 176x numbers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
